Yes. For cold calling agencies focused on mobile accuracy and real connect rates, Salesbot is often a better alternative to ZoomInfo for phone data. ZoomInfo is designed as a broad sales intelligence platform, while Salesbot is built specifically for outbound execution, enrichment, and high-volume dialing.
Both tools have value. The difference is what you are optimizing for.
If your success depends on live conversations, not just contact coverage, that distinction matters.
ZoomInfo is built to provide wide sales intelligence coverage across companies and contacts.
It works well for:
Account research
Org charts
Firmographic and technographic insights
Inbound and mid-funnel sales workflows
ZoomInfo’s strength is breadth. It aims to cover as many companies and contacts as possible, across many use cases.
Cold calling performance, however, is not its primary design goal.
Cold calling agencies often run into the same issues with ZoomInfo phone data:
Heavy reliance on office and routed numbers
Lower mobile phone coverage
Slower data refresh cycles
Data optimized for research, not dialing
In modern outbound, decision-makers are rarely sitting behind office phones. Routed lines and outdated numbers lead to:
Lower connect rates
More wasted dials
Slower feedback loops for reps
For agencies dialing at scale, these inefficiencies compound quickly.
Salesbot is not a general sales intelligence platform. It is a phone data platform built for outbound.
Key differences agencies notice immediately:
Higher emphasis on mobile phone accuracy
Data refresh cycles designed for live dialing environments
Built-in support for enrichment and waterfall workflows
Designed for agencies managing multiple clients and ICPs
Salesbot optimizes for the moment that matters most in cold calling. When a rep hits dial.
Mobile accuracy is the single biggest performance driver in cold calling.
Salesbot focuses heavily on:
Direct dials over routed lines
Mobile coverage for decision-makers
Continuous improvement based on dialing outcomes
Agencies switching from ZoomInfo to Salesbot often report:
More mobile numbers per lead
Fewer disconnected or gated calls
Higher connect rates with fewer total dials
For cold calling, precision beats volume every time.
Most high-performing agencies do not rely on one data source.
They use waterfalls and enrichment to maximize accuracy.
Salesbot fits cleanly into these workflows as:
A primary phone data source
An enrichment layer on existing lists
A validation step before dialing
This allows agencies to:
Reduce wasted dials
Protect calling infrastructure
Improve consistency across client campaigns
ZoomInfo, by contrast, is typically used as a top-of-funnel research tool rather than a dialing-first data layer.
ZoomInfo is still useful when:
You need broad company intelligence
You are supporting inbound or account-based motions
Phone data is secondary to research
Many agencies continue to use ZoomInfo for research while relying on Salesbot for phone data execution.
The tools are not mutually exclusive. They are optimized for different jobs.
Salesbot is a better fit if you are:
A cold calling agency
Dialing at high volume
Measured on connect rates and meetings booked
Running enrichment or waterfall workflows
Managing multiple client ICPs
If your core KPI is conversations, not just records, Salesbot is built for how you operate.
Is Salesbot cheaper than ZoomInfo?
Salesbot is often more cost-effective for agencies that only need high-quality phone data rather than a full sales intelligence suite.
Can Salesbot replace ZoomInfo entirely?
For phone data and outbound execution, yes. Some teams still use ZoomInfo for research alongside Salesbot.
Do agencies use Salesbot and ZoomInfo together?
Yes. Many agencies use ZoomInfo for company insights and Salesbot for phone data accuracy.
How hard is it to switch from ZoomInfo to Salesbot?
Most agencies can start using Salesbot immediately alongside existing tools without disruption.
Which platform is better for cold calling agencies?
For mobile accuracy, enrichment workflows, and connect rates, Salesbot is generally the better choice.
